<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Processor Utilization Calculations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vpivot.com/2010/04/09/processor-utilization-calculations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vpivot.com/2010/04/09/processor-utilization-calculations/</link>
	<description>Scott Drummonds on Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:54:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://vpivot.com/2010/04/09/processor-utilization-calculations/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpivot.com/?p=387#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

If my summary of that article is correct, AMD is saying nothing more than &quot;physical cores are better than logical cores&quot;.  I can find no reason to disagree with that sentiment.  Seeing as Magny Cours has the highest core density per package, it is logical that AMD wants to tout their advantage with blogs like this.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>If my summary of that article is correct, AMD is saying nothing more than &#8220;physical cores are better than logical cores&#8221;.  I can find no reason to disagree with that sentiment.  Seeing as Magny Cours has the highest core density per package, it is logical that AMD wants to tout their advantage with blogs like this.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 5 Planet V12n blog posts week 14 &#124; VMvisor</title>
		<link>http://vpivot.com/2010/04/09/processor-utilization-calculations/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 5 Planet V12n blog posts week 14 &#124; VMvisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpivot.com/?p=387#comment-659</guid>
		<description>[...] Drummonds &#8211; Processor Utilization CalculationsWhere things get really confusing is when these results are combined into three system-wide, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drummonds &#8211; Processor Utilization CalculationsWhere things get really confusing is when these results are combined into three system-wide, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://vpivot.com/2010/04/09/processor-utilization-calculations/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vpivot.com/?p=387#comment-658</guid>
		<description>Excellent post Scott!! I have recently been using resxtop to closely monitor a recent terminal server migration I performed to a Nehalem host.

Also, any comments on the statements made here by AMD referencing their opinions on HT and Nehalem/Westmere on vSphere vs True Cores?

http://blogs.amd.com/work/2010/03/30/intel-hyper-threading-vs-amd-true-core-scalability/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Scott!! I have recently been using resxtop to closely monitor a recent terminal server migration I performed to a Nehalem host.</p>
<p>Also, any comments on the statements made here by AMD referencing their opinions on HT and Nehalem/Westmere on vSphere vs True Cores?</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.amd.com/work/2010/03/30/intel-hyper-threading-vs-amd-true-core-scalability/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.amd.com/work/2010/03/30/intel-hyper-threading-vs-amd-true-core-scalability/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

